Facts
Jobs
Between January 2001 and January 2003, the nation lost a net
1.6 million jobs and almost 2.3 million private-sector jobs.
During that same time period, 1.85 million manufacturing jobs
disappeared. The number of Americans who want jobs today but
can’t find them—an unacceptable 10 million—will
grow even larger, according to Economic Policy Institute economist
Lawrence Mishel. The Bush proposal will do very little to
expand jobs in 2003, Mishel says, and will actually cause
the country to lose 750,000 jobs over the next 10 years.
Trade
Unfair trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) are a central reason for the explosion of the U.S.
trade deficit—the difference between what the nation
exports and what it imports. Last year, the United States
ran> an all-time record trade deficit in goods> and services
of $435 billion, a jump of> almost $47 billion since 2000
and a completely unsustainable 4 percent of gross domestic
product. The monthly goods deficit in December was a staggering
$48 billion, more than a third higher than the January figure,
indicating a steady deterioration throughout 2002—if
the December rate continues, next year’s trade deficit
will be well more than half a trillion dollars. According
to the AFL-CIO Industrial Union Council, rising trade deficits
have cost 3 million actual and potential U.S. jobs since 1994.
To maintain a domestic manufacturing base that ensures national
security, the United States must address flawed trade policies
that encourage U.S. manufacturers to scour the globe for the
lowest wages, the weakest labor laws and the most vulnerable
workers, and oppose new trade agreements such as the Free
Trade Area of the Americas that harm the interests of America’s
workers.
Health care
After the number of uninsured declined in 1999 and 2000, it
climbed to 41.2 million in 2001, according to the U.S. Census
Bureau. Of that 41.2 million, nearly 33 million were from
working families and 8.5 million were children. Workers who
still have job-based health insurance are in danger of finding
it unaffordable as employers increasingly shift the growing
costs of coverage to workers— between the spring of
2001 and spring of 2002, a single worker paid an average 27
percent more toward premiums and a family paid an average
16 percent more than the previous year, according to the Kaiser
Family Foundation and Health Research and Education Trust
.
The continually increasing cost of prescription drugs has
created a crisis for retirees, most acutely for those who
work in manufacturing where the number of retirees is growing
and the number of active workers is shrinking. The cost of
the 50 prescriptions most used by American seniors rose 7.8
percent between January 2001 and January 2002, according to
Families USA. Congress must pass a Medicare drug benefit that
does not force seniors to give up their trusted doctors to
get decent drug coverage, as the Bush administration has proposed,
and does not penalize workers whose employers offer benefits.
Retirement security
Because of corporate wrongdoing, the bust of the high-tech
bubble and the recession, American stock markets lost approximately
$6.6 trillion, or about 40 percent of their value, between
the market peak in March 2000 and Jan. 31, 2003. Such stunning
losses call for corporate governance reform, strengthened
government oversight and the protection of Social Security.
According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, Social
Security was the only source of income for 18 percent of individuals
and married couples with at least one spouse 65 or older in
2000. The Bush administration likely will borrow a minimum
of $1.5 trillion from the Social Security Trust Fund before
Bush’s 2001 tax cuts begin to expire in 2010, according
to the Congressional Budget Office—without setting aside
a single penny to strengthen and protect Social Security.
Education
At a time when states are facing budget crises and their education
funding is at risk, President George W. Bush’s 2004
fiscal year budget proposal for schools increases their problems
by failing to keep pace with inflation and population growth.
When all programs under the federal No Child Left Behind Act
are added together, Bush’s budget provides $9 billion
less than Congress authorized for 2004 and $199 million less
than the amount needed to maintain purchasing power at the
2002 level, according to the AFT. While showering tax cuts
on the rich, Bush’s budget proposes eliminating after-school
programs for 500,000 children.